Grandmas Wisdom is a skill for AI agents that evaluates whether academic citations actually support the claims being made from them. Rather than performing a simple cross-reference check, it analyzes evidential substance, logical consistency, and longitudinal validity of scholarly sources. The core output is a 1–10 Bullshit Meter score with an actionable interpretation, giving an agent a concrete signal about whether a citation is trustworthy. Alongside the score, the skill produces a structured breakdown of evidential support, flags overclaim risks, and delivers explicit Tenable or Not Tenable verdicts for each claim under review. It also performs longitudinal reevaluation as new literature is discovered, meaning a claim that was defensible earlier can be revisited when the evidence base changes. Internally the skill uses a multi-pass process that maps conceptual connections and measures the gap between what a source literally supports and what is being inferred from it. This is distinct from asking a general-purpose model to judge truthfulness, because the skill applies specialized reasoning structures including what the description calls a Spiral Reasoning Tree and Veritas Aegis safeguards. The intended use case is research workflows where an AI agent must produce defensible academic work and cannot afford to propagate hallucinated or miscited sources. There are no environment variables or external tool integrations listed for this skill.
Grandmas Wisdom
Verify academic citations and claims with a rigorous bullshit detection framework for AI agents.
Install
cmdop skills install agensi-grandmas-wisdom
Use cases
- Verify that a cited paper actually supports the specific claim an agent is making before including it in a report
- Score a batch of citations on a 1–10 scale to prioritize which need human review
- Detect overclaiming when an agent infers more from a source than the source's evidence warrants
- Flag hallucinated or fabricated citations before they appear in generated academic content
- Reevaluate previously accepted citations when new literature is introduced into the workflow
- Produce structured Tenable or Not Tenable verdicts for claims in a literature review pipeline
When to use it
- An AI agent is generating or summarizing academic content and citations need to be checked for accuracy
- A workflow requires explicit evidence-quality scoring before conclusions are passed downstream
- The agent is working with domains where overclaiming from limited evidence is a known risk
- Longitudinal tracking of citation validity across an evolving literature base is needed
When not to use it
- The task involves non-academic sources such as news articles, social media, or internal documents
- No tool list is exposed, so integration details are unclear for tightly constrained production pipelines
- The workflow requires real-time database lookups against live academic repositories, which this skill does not list as a capability
- A lightweight, fast citation format check is all that is needed rather than deep evidential analysis